CoverageCheck

Read a coverage program

Policy documents in, a cited coverage picture out.

Meridian Ridge Constructors, LLC

Each card is a set of documents. Reading one files the result under this client and takes a few minutes.

A complete program, five policies, no gap

Five carriers, five documents · General liability + four excess layers, complete

Synthetic documents, written for this demonstration. Every company, policy, and claim is fictitious, and every page says so.

Five documents go in and one tower comes out: a general liability primary and four excess layers, each naming the layer beneath it by policy number, closing at $102,000,000 with nothing missing and nothing to decide. The documents are synthetic, written for this demonstration, fictitious and labeled so on every page.

5 documents

The same program, and what the claims already took

Five carriers, five documents · The complete program + a loss run that joins

Synthetic documents, written for this demonstration. Every company, policy, and claim is fictitious, and every page says so.

The five policy tower stands at $102,000,000, and the carrier's loss run joins it by the general liability policy's own number: $1,454,000 of incurred losses against the $4,000,000 general aggregate, leaving $2,546,000. The documents are synthetic, written for this demonstration, fictitious and labeled so on every page.

6 documents

The renewing term, and what moved in it

Five carriers, five documents · General liability + four excess layers, the renewing term

Synthetic documents, written for this demonstration. Every company, policy, and claim is fictitious, and every page says so.

The same five carriers one year on, term 1 April 2027 to 1 April 2028. The second excess layer renews at $15,000,000 rather than $25,000,000, the layers above it attach lower to close the stack without a gap, the tower ends at $92,000,000, the general liability declarations carry a Communicable Disease Exclusion the expiring term does not, and the general aggregate prints fresh. The documents are synthetic, written for this demonstration, fictitious and labeled so on every page.

5 documents

The competing quote, cheaper and shorterStart here

Five carriers, a competing market · General liability + four excess layers, the competing quote

Synthetic documents, written for this demonstration. Every company, policy, and claim is fictitious, and every page says so.

A second market quotes the same renewal term, 1 April 2027 to 1 April 2028, attaching at the same four points as the incumbent's renewal. It is priced at $502,450 against $553,650, which is $51,200 less, and its top layer is written at $35,000,000 rather than $40,000,000, so it reaches $87,000,000 rather than $92,000,000. The documents are synthetic, written for this demonstration, fictitious and labeled so on every page.

5 documents

Read new documents

Insurance policies, quotes, endorsements, or a loss run, as PDFs. The reading opens here when it finishes. It is not filed under a client on this instance, so it is gone when you leave.

Drop the PDFs here

A program is usually several files: a primary, an umbrella, and the excess layers above them.

PDF only · up to 6 files · 50 MB each

Your documents reach this site’s host, and their text reaches the model that reads them. The files are deleted after the reading. Do not upload anything you could not send to a third party.

10 run on every reading

Does every layer attach where the layer beneath it exhausts?

Did every policy provided make it into the tower?

Was every policy named in a schedule of underlying insurance provided?

Do all the policies name the same insured?

Do all layers run on the same policy period?

Are defense costs payable in addition to the limits?

Did the carrier give notice that it reduced this coverage?

Is any coverage capped below the policy limit?

Do the attached endorsements restrict this coverage?

Is the remaining aggregate known?

0 recorded

Recorded

DecisionPolicyDecided byWhen
Nothing has been decided on this review.